Laura’s Notes on the 11/14/2024 Berkeley Heights BOE Meeting
The meeting covered numerous topics, with significant discussions and public input. Here’s a breakdown of the essential points:
Guidance Program Presentation
Dr. Ashley Janosko delivered a comprehensive presentation on the guidance program at BHPS. While the presentation emphasized support for college-bound students, concerns remain about equitable resources for students pursuing alternative career paths. Many feel that career readiness deserves more focus and resources.
Ethics Allegations and Public Statements
Board member Hyman addressed the ongoing case from the Office of Administrative Law (OAL), refuting claims from a local “watch group.” However, the group maintains their position that they only reported factual updates.
Despite serious ethics findings against Stanley, Hyman, and others, no apologies were issued. An apology for unfair or inappropriate actions could go a long way in rebuilding trust.
A former BOE member praised Hyman’s for making a statement.
John highlighted the seriousness of the ethics violations, emphasizing that these should not be downplayed and that reporting on the matter has been factual.
Shauna Williams, one of the community members who filed an ethics complaint against Stanley, Hyman, and others, spoke during the meeting.
Shauna emphasized that her reporting was not misleading but presented factual accounts of the events. Williams stated that the case had been referred back to the School Ethics Commission (SEC) following a ruling by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL). The SEC was the first body to validate the claims which led to this most recent review of the case by the OAL.
Williams urged Bradford to request that Stanley and Hyman issue a public apology to Mrs. Akiri, reflecting accountability and acknowledgment of their actions.
A former BOE candidate asked both Hyman and Stanley to step down from their Board seats citing the the repeated, unbecoming behavior, for elected representatives.
Other Public Comments
BOE Member-Elect Terrero raised concerns about guidance for non-college-bound students, advocating for tailored support and resources.
John asked the Board to consider cutting excesses in administration, Security, and Athletics in the upcoming budget to fund tutoring and academic support for all students in need.
A resident raised concerns about the potential disruption the proposed permanent lighting at the GL field may cause.
Policy Revisions Debate
Joly and Khanna advocated for more balanced representation in key committees (Personnel, Policy, and Finance), often dominated by Stanley and Bradford.
Stanley opposed the changes, calling them a “power grab,” but Joly countered with historical examples of fairer policies.
Joly had to address inappropriate facial expressions from Stanley during discussions and public comments, with Bradford backing her up.
NJ21st does not profit from its content, does not accept money for campaign or business advertisements and is not run by a corporation. We welcome content from ALL residents, regardless of political affiliation to contribute content as long as they work or reside in the 21st District and abide by our terms.
Related Articles