Another set of ethics allegations validated by the SEC moves on to a Judge
There is now a third SEC-validated complaint against Ms. Stanley to arise out of what many feel were politically motivated actions by the Board against Ms. Akiri. In a somewhat ironic twist, a large portion of the complaint against Ms. Akiri was dismissed, and the remainder appears to be based on allegations that can easily be refuted once they get in front of a judge.
Ms. Stanley, whose justification in voting for the first attempt initiated by Mr. Cianculli that backfired, included protecting staff (likely meaning Dr. Varley and Julie Kot), voted to cut supervisory positions. This is another consequence of Ms. Stanley’s action that taxpayers are on the hook for.
The SEC found probable cause on six of nine counts in this third SEC-validated complaint against Ms. Stanley. The complainant voluntarily withdrew on two counts, and one count was dismissed by the SEC.
The current firm employed by the District, who gave Ms. Stanley’s actions the stamp of approval, will likely also profit from their advice – this is the third case they will likely defend caused by actions they green-lighted and this is the third case to be forwarded to the OAL on the Board’s actions against Ms. Akiri.
Along with Ms. Stanley, facing OAL decisions on cases connected to this matter are Ms. Penna, Ms. Young, Mr. Hyman, and Mr. Cianciulli.
Ms. Penna and a former BOE Member are also facing the OAL on an ethics complaint validated by the SEC in connection to an LTE she wrote in response to Ms. Akiri’s op-ed on the Budget last year.
Related Articles:
THERE’S MORE; PAMELA STANLEY’S UNETHICAL ENCORE
PAMELA STANLEY, ETHICS AND THE GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING
HOW TO DESTROY A CHANGE AGENT | PART I
HOW MUCH MORE SHOULD WE BE EXPECTED TO TOLERATE?
DR. MELISSA VARLEY’S TAX PAYER FUNDED DEFENSE
DR. VARLEY’S NEPOTISM SETTLEMENT AND CONCERNING QUESTIONS FOR THE BOARD ATTORNEY
One thought on “Ms. Stanley’s District-Funded Ethics Complaint Against Sai Akiri Continues to Backfire”